Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55491 - 55500 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 55491 - 55500 of 83958 for simple case search.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
adoptive parent from the beginning of the case; he filed a petition for adoption along with the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
adoptive parent from the beginning of the case; he filed a petition for adoption along with the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
State v. Brian M.
, 381 N.W.2d 333 (1986). ¶10 Davis, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6458 - 2005-03-31
, 381 N.W.2d 333 (1986). ¶10 Davis, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6458 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In the instant case, the sentencing court’s oral pronouncement on count two imposed but stayed “the max; two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181647 - 2017-09-21
. In the instant case, the sentencing court’s oral pronouncement on count two imposed but stayed “the max; two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94659 - 2014-09-15
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94659 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Spencer Hutchinson v. Robert Buckley
) dismissing this case and imposing sanctions. Because of Hutchinson’s insufficient discovery response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3652 - 2017-09-19
) dismissing this case and imposing sanctions. Because of Hutchinson’s insufficient discovery response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3652 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas C. Smith
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas B.
, but the court suppressed the statements taken on July 18, 1996, regarding the razor blades. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12458 - 2005-03-31
, but the court suppressed the statements taken on July 18, 1996, regarding the razor blades. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12458 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
This case is distinguishable from Riekkoff, however. In that case, the defendant pled guilty believing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
This case is distinguishable from Riekkoff, however. In that case, the defendant pled guilty believing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
A.I.M. Returnable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. Rose Stafford
. 2 The record does not establish the trial date for the divorce case and the corporate claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20
. 2 The record does not establish the trial date for the divorce case and the corporate claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20