Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5551 - 5560 of 36014 for affidavit of mailing.

Harvest States Cooperatives v. Timothy Anderson
confirmation of contract in the mail. Anderson testified that he looked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13052 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Joseph Jackson v.
and address by an attorney with the state bar constitutes a consent to service by certified mail
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17387 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 118
of the following: (a) Notify by certified mail all clients being represented in pending matters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55194 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the police department and “turn[ed] it over to [the] administrative assistant to be mailed to the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211071 - 2018-04-18

[PDF] Frontsheet
of preparing, printing, delivering, and mailing absentee ballots by the statutorily required deadlines.6 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760485 - 2024-02-02

[PDF] Kohler Company v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.
). 3 The notice was effective when mailed. See WIS. STAT. § 180.0141(5)(b). No. 99-2115 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15865 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. In a January 30 e-mail to one of those superiors, Keith Ryniak, Hetzel related that workers in the optical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110997 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by letter of August 31, 2012. Couturier received the December 2016 letter from RPS by registered mail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241880 - 2019-06-11

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Judith A. Pinchar
4, 2002, a second letter was sent to Attorney Pinchar via both first-class mail and certified mail
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16686 - 2005-03-31

Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
for issuing a conditional use permit, such as mailing notices to land owners within 100 feet of the premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3534 - 2005-03-31