Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5551 - 5560 of 63631 for child support.
Search results 5551 - 5560 of 63631 for child support.
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
judgments convicting him of two counts of repeated sexual assault of the same child on his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
judgments convicting him of two counts of repeated sexual assault of the same child on his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4720 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
judgments convicting him of two counts of repeated sexual assault of the same child on his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31
judgments convicting him of two counts of repeated sexual assault of the same child on his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, child support payments, and efforts to reinstate his driver's license rather than spending money
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370287 - 2021-05-25
, child support payments, and efforts to reinstate his driver's license rather than spending money
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370287 - 2021-05-25
Janet E. McCrillis v. Harold O. McCrillis
property and determining maintenance and child support, [it is] inappropriate to enforce an absolute bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14657 - 2005-03-31
property and determining maintenance and child support, [it is] inappropriate to enforce an absolute bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Janet E. McCrillis v. Harold O. McCrillis
property and determining maintenance and child support, [it is] inappropriate to enforce an absolute bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14657 - 2017-09-21
property and determining maintenance and child support, [it is] inappropriate to enforce an absolute bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14657 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Emanuel P.
evidence in the record to support the grounds alleged in the TPR action, and in finding that Emmanuel P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15635 - 2017-09-21
evidence in the record to support the grounds alleged in the TPR action, and in finding that Emmanuel P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15635 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
testified in support of the termination of Robert’s parental rights. However, when the proceeding resumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36257 - 2009-04-22
testified in support of the termination of Robert’s parental rights. However, when the proceeding resumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36257 - 2009-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Roy L. Rogers
contentions but offers no support for his conclusions. Detective Wesley testified that he “interviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13218 - 2017-09-21
contentions but offers no support for his conclusions. Detective Wesley testified that he “interviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13218 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roy L. Rogers
. The record confirms some of Rogers’s contentions but offers no support for his conclusions. Detective Wesley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13218 - 2005-03-31
. The record confirms some of Rogers’s contentions but offers no support for his conclusions. Detective Wesley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13218 - 2005-03-31
State v. Emanuel P.
that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the grounds alleged in the TPR action, and in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15635 - 2005-03-31
that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the grounds alleged in the TPR action, and in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15635 - 2005-03-31