Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5551 - 5560 of 83259 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 5551 - 5560 of 83259 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
exception applies to searches like the one in this case even if they would have been unconstitutional under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63470 - 2011-05-02
exception applies to searches like the one in this case even if they would have been unconstitutional under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63470 - 2011-05-02
State v. Jerry C.O.
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerry C.O.
search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer Gary Cole testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11213 - 2017-09-19
search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer Gary Cole testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11213 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
to § 161.41(1m)(h)1, STATS. On appeal, Lewandoske challenges the issuance and execution of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8291 - 2017-09-19
to § 161.41(1m)(h)1, STATS. On appeal, Lewandoske challenges the issuance and execution of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8291 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
for the search warrant was based was stale. Based upon our review of the circumstances of this case, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
for the search warrant was based was stale. Based upon our review of the circumstances of this case, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Concepcion Relerford
to continue the search. We agree with the third contention and, as a result, it is unnecessary to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12224 - 2017-09-21
to continue the search. We agree with the third contention and, as a result, it is unnecessary to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12224 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter J. Bartram
substance. The issue is whether the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
substance. The issue is whether the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. Bartram
the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude that part of Bartram’s argument is made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15864 - 2017-09-21
the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude that part of Bartram’s argument is made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15864 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven H. Robinson
” search-warrant case, as this one is. We consider our discussion of the reliability of the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12525 - 2005-03-31
” search-warrant case, as this one is. We consider our discussion of the reliability of the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven H. Robinson
. Anderson, 138 Wis.2d 451, 406 N.W.2d 398 (1987), a “regular” search-warrant case, as this one is. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12525 - 2017-09-21
. Anderson, 138 Wis.2d 451, 406 N.W.2d 398 (1987), a “regular” search-warrant case, as this one is. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12525 - 2017-09-21