Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55501 - 55510 of 68235 for law.
Search results 55501 - 55510 of 68235 for law.
State v. Diane M. Mikic
performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. Here, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. Here, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
); WIS. STAT. § 968.24 (“[A] law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883294 - 2024-12-05
); WIS. STAT. § 968.24 (“[A] law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883294 - 2024-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Andrews, 2009 WI App 30, ¶10, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2010-02-01
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Andrews, 2009 WI App 30, ¶10, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
than expected); and (4) whether the resulting decision would augment our case law. Quelle, 198 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261924 - 2020-05-27
than expected); and (4) whether the resulting decision would augment our case law. Quelle, 198 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261924 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
Brown County v. Noreen O.
for prepaying Thoma’s witness fee. Interpretation of the statute is a question of law. Morris v. Juneau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6083 - 2017-09-19
for prepaying Thoma’s witness fee. Interpretation of the statute is a question of law. Morris v. Juneau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6083 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims that, as a result, the case became a “private prosecution of a criminal matter,” contrary to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47621 - 2014-09-15
claims that, as a result, the case became a “private prosecution of a criminal matter,” contrary to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47621 - 2014-09-15
Liborio Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we will affirm the circuit court’s decision granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14704 - 2014-06-09
party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we will affirm the circuit court’s decision granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14704 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Jody Mayo
of the criminal law know well its untrustworthy character.” …. … When a witness substantially recants his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11877 - 2017-09-21
of the criminal law know well its untrustworthy character.” …. … When a witness substantially recants his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11877 - 2017-09-21
Brown County v. Noreen O.
. Interpretation of the statute is a question of law. Morris v. Juneau County, 219 Wis. 2d 543, 550, 579 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6083 - 2005-03-31
. Interpretation of the statute is a question of law. Morris v. Juneau County, 219 Wis. 2d 543, 550, 579 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6083 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Strand
of Strand’s release. The court determined as a matter of law that Strand was within ninety days of release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3906 - 2009-03-31
of Strand’s release. The court determined as a matter of law that Strand was within ninety days of release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3906 - 2009-03-31