Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55511 - 55520 of 67826 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS
the law into their own hands. Regarding rehabilitative needs, the court discussed Zunac’s sporadic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30271 - 2007-09-17

COURT OF APPEALS
by the court” and that the “court was not entertaining a review of specific federal or state law.” However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93769 - 2013-03-06

COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law we review without deference. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28738 - 2007-04-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. A question of constitutional fact is a mixed question of law and fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70833 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dennis Taff v. Town of Burke
and that they agree that the material facts are undisputed. The appeal therefore presents only questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4045 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
bathroom was constitutionally lawful as incident to Sloan’s arrest. See Chimel, 395 U.S. at 762-63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39275 - 2009-08-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
are clearly stronger because they are “clearly defined under the law,” unlike the issues he originally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948937 - 2025-04-29

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, and he offers only vague generalities from case law that do not squarely address the issue. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27363 - 2006-12-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352433 - 2021-04-06

[PDF] State v. Christopher D. Rose
and reasonable inferences from those facts, that an individual is [or was] violating the law.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7238 - 2017-09-20