Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55521 - 55530 of 57675 for id.

Jesse J.A. v. Michael P.S.
). Indeed, “we generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary decisions.” Id. at 591, 478 N.W.2d at 39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12060 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, that time period did not transform the investigative stop into an a de facto arrest. See id. ¶17 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26846 - 2006-10-18

COURT OF APPEALS
error was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.’” Id. (citation omitted). In doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101254 - 2013-08-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
whether the parties’ agreement regarding the mandatory minimum was justified. See id. 3 Both acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71521 - 2014-09-15

State v. Terry T.
Offender Program (SJOP) placement. Id. at ¶1. On remand, the juvenile court amended the dispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5682 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
the referee's legal conclusions. Id. Here, the record supports the referee's findings of fact and legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29810 - 2007-07-23

Nina Kennedy v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
will be entered on the registry. Id. The Department maintains a registry containing a list of persons for whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8933 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of that statute, the filing of the petition is to trigger a deadline for a hearing. See id. Klein indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578450 - 2022-10-19

[PDF] Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
erroneous. Id. Nos. 94-2907 & 94-3269 -7- Following the original divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8236 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Catalytic Combustion Corporation v. Vapor Extraction Technology, Inc.
jurisdiction. Id. at 296-97 (quoting Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 179 Wis. 2d 42, 53, 505 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2270 - 2017-09-19