Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55531 - 55540 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 55531 - 55540 of 83958 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wabitsch was assigned to the case. ¶7 Trial counsel testified that she did not learn of the plea offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15
Wabitsch was assigned to the case. ¶7 Trial counsel testified that she did not learn of the plea offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the case was set to reconvene at 9:00 a.m. the next day. By 10:45 a.m. on April 5, 2011, trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109958 - 2017-09-21
and the case was set to reconvene at 9:00 a.m. the next day. By 10:45 a.m. on April 5, 2011, trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109958 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 135
2011 WI APP 135 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP3036
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69581 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI APP 135 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP3036
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69581 - 2014-09-15
Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13877 - 2005-03-31
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13877 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Lohmeier
of these cases were decided under WIS. STAT. § 57.072 (1975), which was repealed and recreated by ch. 353, Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2166 - 2017-09-19
of these cases were decided under WIS. STAT. § 57.072 (1975), which was repealed and recreated by ch. 353, Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2166 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles B. Dietzen
, and takes the case to a higher tribunal, where the question is to be decided and the judgment, sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8932 - 2017-09-19
, and takes the case to a higher tribunal, where the question is to be decided and the judgment, sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8932 - 2017-09-19
State v. Auston J.S.
. The court shall make the findings specified in this subdivision on a case-by-case basis based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7665 - 2005-03-31
. The court shall make the findings specified in this subdivision on a case-by-case basis based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Willie Bankston
the intensive sanctions program in every single case where I know that it may not be appropriate." Unlike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8334 - 2017-09-19
the intensive sanctions program in every single case where I know that it may not be appropriate." Unlike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8334 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088564 - 2026-03-10
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088564 - 2026-03-10
Milwaukee County v. Charmaine B.
circumstances. “Moot cases will be decided on the merits only in the most exceptional or compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14355 - 2005-03-31
circumstances. “Moot cases will be decided on the merits only in the most exceptional or compelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14355 - 2005-03-31