Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5561 - 5570 of 68485 for did.
Search results 5561 - 5570 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: The [sentencing] court considered that the defendant did not have a prior record and that he “was a good family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559204 - 2022-08-30
: The [sentencing] court considered that the defendant did not have a prior record and that he “was a good family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559204 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Thomas R. Kinnaman
that arrested him did not have probable cause to do so, and therefore he did not violate the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
that arrested him did not have probable cause to do so, and therefore he did not violate the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
) he did not receive proper notice of the prior convictions that support the repeater enhancer; (2) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34465 - 2008-11-03
) he did not receive proper notice of the prior convictions that support the repeater enhancer; (2) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34465 - 2008-11-03
[PDF]
State v. Steven Curtes
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. NO. 96-3458-CR 2 the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11784 - 2017-09-20
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. NO. 96-3458-CR 2 the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11784 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 Bevan did not submit a respondent’s brief. Accordingly, this appeal is decided solely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129474 - 2017-09-21
1 Bevan did not submit a respondent’s brief. Accordingly, this appeal is decided solely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129474 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the information he received about the shooting came from another jail inmate. Counsel for Stokes did not cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34098 - 2014-09-15
of the information he received about the shooting came from another jail inmate. Counsel for Stokes did not cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34098 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the motion in limine order prejudiced him, that the curative instruction did not resolve the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48541 - 2014-09-15
of the motion in limine order prejudiced him, that the curative instruction did not resolve the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48541 - 2014-09-15
Thomas M. Eugster v. Dawn R. Eugster
dismissed because she did not comply with the notice provision of Wis. Stat. § 767.327(1). That statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3316 - 2005-03-31
dismissed because she did not comply with the notice provision of Wis. Stat. § 767.327(1). That statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Pauline Orsted v. Ervin Orsted
of payment. Because this court concludes that the divorce judgment did not provide for the accrual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12130 - 2017-09-21
of payment. Because this court concludes that the divorce judgment did not provide for the accrual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12130 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to move the boxes of marijuana. When they discovered they did not have a key, they broke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33275 - 2008-07-07
to move the boxes of marijuana. When they discovered they did not have a key, they broke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33275 - 2008-07-07