Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5561 - 5570 of 12798 for se.
Search results 5561 - 5570 of 12798 for se.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, P.J. Warren A. Moffett, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28567 - 2007-03-26
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, P.J. Warren A. Moffett, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28567 - 2007-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Donald Leiser, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111905 - 2017-09-21
. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Donald Leiser, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶25 McCaskill averred only that the court did not inquire into his competency to proceed pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172252 - 2017-09-21
¶25 McCaskill averred only that the court did not inquire into his competency to proceed pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172252 - 2017-09-21
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Ira R. Banks
PER CURIAM. Ira R. Banks, pro se, appeals from a grant of summary judgment resulting in a real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7426 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Ira R. Banks, pro se, appeals from a grant of summary judgment resulting in a real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7426 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Donald Leiser, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111905 - 2014-05-12
PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Donald Leiser, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111905 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing, his pro se motion in which he asserted claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, a Brady1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307053 - 2020-11-24
a hearing, his pro se motion in which he asserted claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, a Brady1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307053 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
Simmons’s original postconviction motion, his pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) motion, as well as his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28401 - 2014-09-15
Simmons’s original postconviction motion, his pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) motion, as well as his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28401 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
se “Verified Notice and Demand by Third Party Intervenors.” The motion to intervene claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
se “Verified Notice and Demand by Third Party Intervenors.” The motion to intervene claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and Beasley appealed. We affirmed. Beasley then filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781846 - 2024-03-28
, and Beasley appealed. We affirmed. Beasley then filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781846 - 2024-03-28
[PDF]
State v. Travis A. Curtis
will not discuss them further, except to the extent Curtis addresses them in his pro se response. Curtis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12163 - 2017-09-21
will not discuss them further, except to the extent Curtis addresses them in his pro se response. Curtis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12163 - 2017-09-21