Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55601 - 55610 of 83389 for simple case search.

[PDF] Clarence C. Joseph v. Gary R. McCaughtry
an unsuccessful appeal to the superintendent. The trial court decided in Case No. 96 CV 172 that WCI had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12273 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was arrested, charged, and the case was tried to a jury. Grunwald’s main theory of defense was that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100496 - 2013-08-07

COURT OF APPEALS
to the trial court’s conclusion. Id. at 508-09. ¶4 On a case-by-case basis the conduct of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28760 - 2007-04-24

Daniel Khalar v. James Murphy
in this case, it must come, if at all, from our discretionary authority under § 752.35, Stats.: The expiration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10161 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James A. Rehrauer v. City of Milwaukee
., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, P.J. This case involves the circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20827 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Commissioner of Transp., 135 Wis. 2d 195, 198, 400 N.W.2d 15 (Ct. App. 1986). This case requires us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27360 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
‘the circumstances of the case and the counsel’s conduct and strategy.’” Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190894 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in that case for the circuit court to exercise its discretion in determining whether a new factor justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185369 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
), and Schneider v. State, 51 Wis. 2d 458, 463, 187 N.W.2d 172 (1971). Secors contends that both of those cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346310 - 2021-03-16

COURT OF APPEALS
itself and the case was reassigned to another judge.[12] ¶26 In the weeks after the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120146 - 2014-08-25