Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55681 - 55690 of 61946 for judgment.
Search results 55681 - 55690 of 61946 for judgment.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the circuit court’s judgment of conviction and denied Matthews’s postconviction motion for relief. Id., ¶27
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033303 - 2025-11-05
the circuit court’s judgment of conviction and denied Matthews’s postconviction motion for relief. Id., ¶27
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033303 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Eugene Walker appeals a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
Eugene Walker appeals a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luis G. Flores
was decided. Lagundoye, 268 Wis. 2d 77, ¶2. Since Flores did not appeal from the original judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4685 - 2017-09-19
was decided. Lagundoye, 268 Wis. 2d 77, ¶2. Since Flores did not appeal from the original judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4685 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Jeffrey A. Conen entered the underlying judgments of conviction. The Honorable David L. Borowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133146 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey A. Conen entered the underlying judgments of conviction. The Honorable David L. Borowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133146 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andrew R. Knauer
, the court in the prior proceeding entered a judgment of conviction for OWI on February 29, 2000. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5879 - 2017-09-19
, the court in the prior proceeding entered a judgment of conviction for OWI on February 29, 2000. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5879 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction. See State v. 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26787 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction. See State v. 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26787 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the board might reasonably make the order or determination in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61129 - 2014-09-15
will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the board might reasonably make the order or determination in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61129 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
December Table of unpublished opinions
/16/04 Affirmed 04-0705-CR State v. William G. Henriksen 11/09/04 Judgment affirmed; order
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37 - 2017-09-20
/16/04 Affirmed 04-0705-CR State v. William G. Henriksen 11/09/04 Judgment affirmed; order
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court expressly stated that, in assessing prejudice, “a circuit court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517981 - 2022-05-05
. The court expressly stated that, in assessing prejudice, “a circuit court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517981 - 2022-05-05
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Not recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Not recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31