Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5571 - 5580 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5571 - 5580 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeking relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. “‘[I]n a postconviction setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96182 - 2014-09-15
seeking relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. “‘[I]n a postconviction setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96182 - 2014-09-15
Arcadia Financial, Ltd. v. Susannah Q. Carey
. This requires us to interpret and apply the statutes that are material here. Our review is, therefore, de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2102 - 2005-03-31
. This requires us to interpret and apply the statutes that are material here. Our review is, therefore, de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2102 - 2005-03-31
Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
on costs. Under Wis. Stat. § 227.485(6) (2001-02),[1] the circuit court has authority to make a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas D. Severson
require reversal is a question of law that we review de novo. See Monroe County v. Kruse, 76 Wis. 2d 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5275 - 2005-03-31
require reversal is a question of law that we review de novo. See Monroe County v. Kruse, 76 Wis. 2d 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court. This court reviews a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172934 - 2017-09-21
court. This court reviews a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172934 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kirk Ennenga
by this court. However, paragraph (f) sets forth an objective standard that we review de novo as a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15011 - 2017-09-21
by this court. However, paragraph (f) sets forth an objective standard that we review de novo as a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15011 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nazir I. Al-Mujaahid v. City of Milwaukee
The issue is one of statutory construction—a question of law which we consider de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15038 - 2017-09-21
The issue is one of statutory construction—a question of law which we consider de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15038 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are “substantial” presents a question of law which we review de novo. Jalovec v. Jalovec, 2007 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
are “substantial” presents a question of law which we review de novo. Jalovec v. Jalovec, 2007 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
State v. Jameel H. Ali
de novo. See Post, 197 Wis. 2d at 301. “There is a presumption of constitutionality for legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17753 - 2005-04-18
de novo. See Post, 197 Wis. 2d at 301. “There is a presumption of constitutionality for legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17753 - 2005-04-18
Jevic Enterprises, Inc. v. Arlo E. Schultz
of law, which we review de novo. Waukesha Concrete Products Co., Inc. v. Capital Indem. Corp., 127 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. Waukesha Concrete Products Co., Inc. v. Capital Indem. Corp., 127 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31