Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5571 - 5580 of 29942 for des.

[PDF] Katherine Kellner v. Dean A. Kellner
the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 33, 577 N.W.2d at 37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14359 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Tony Chaney v. Jeffery Endicott
, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10927 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
,’ and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60678 - 2011-03-08

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
American Family. Whether a motion to dismiss was properly granted is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017755 - 2025-10-01

[PDF] Gordon C. Michaels v. Kettle Moraine Electric, Inc.
is a question of fact for the jury. ¶4 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26212 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ryan Fontecchio
from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15658 - 2005-03-31

State v. Wua Xiong
). Whether the defendant has shown the existence of a new factor is a question of law we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31

James Burkmaster v. Robert Wayne Heimerl
of discretion is a question of law, reviewed de novo. Luciani v. Montemurro-Luciani, 199 Wis.2d 280, 294, 544
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12158 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James Burkmaster v. Robert Wayne Heimerl
is a question of law, reviewed de novo. Luciani v. Montemurro- Luciani, 199 Wis.2d 280, 294, 544 N.W.2d 561
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12158 - 2017-09-21

Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
known, warrants a frivolousness determination, is a question of law we review de novo. Stern v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31