Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5571 - 5580 of 18721 for quote.
Search results 5571 - 5580 of 18721 for quote.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or behaviors exhibiting dangerousness outlined in § 51.20(1)(a)2.a.-e. 395 Wis. 2d 460, ¶25 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
, or behaviors exhibiting dangerousness outlined in § 51.20(1)(a)2.a.-e. 395 Wis. 2d 460, ¶25 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
State v. Andre L. Avery
. A jury cannot 'segregate evidence into separate intellectual boxes.'" Id. at 131 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11530 - 2005-03-31
. A jury cannot 'segregate evidence into separate intellectual boxes.'" Id. at 131 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11530 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Franklin
.’” See id. at 309-310 (quoting Nelson v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 489, 497-98, 195 N.W.2d 629 (1972
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21
.’” See id. at 309-310 (quoting Nelson v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 489, 497-98, 195 N.W.2d 629 (1972
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21
State v. Julian Andersen
(Ct. App. 1991) (quoting Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971)). “Santobello proscribes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13205 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1991) (quoting Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971)). “Santobello proscribes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. (quoted source omitted). We independently review whether a jury instruction accurately states the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59772 - 2014-09-15
. (quoted source omitted). We independently review whether a jury instruction accurately states the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59772 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” Id., ¶21 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936846 - 2025-04-09
from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” Id., ¶21 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936846 - 2025-04-09
[PDF]
as [unrelated] inquiries do not measurably extend the duration of the stop.’” Id. (quoting Arizona v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277917 - 2020-08-13
as [unrelated] inquiries do not measurably extend the duration of the stop.’” Id. (quoting Arizona v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277917 - 2020-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” with the La Crosse County circuit court. Jackson attached to his request the above-quoted notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
” with the La Crosse County circuit court. Jackson attached to his request the above-quoted notice of intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Carter, 2010 WI 40, ¶22, 324 Wis. 2d 640, 782 N.W.2d 695 (quoting Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199399 - 2017-10-31
. State v. Carter, 2010 WI 40, ¶22, 324 Wis. 2d 640, 782 N.W.2d 695 (quoting Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199399 - 2017-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to his contention, the quoted excerpt from that brief does not imply—let alone show—that any records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111905 - 2014-05-12
to his contention, the quoted excerpt from that brief does not imply—let alone show—that any records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111905 - 2014-05-12