Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5571 - 5580 of 58508 for speedy trial.
Search results 5571 - 5580 of 58508 for speedy trial.
State v. Antonio Jackson
motion for a new trial. Because Jackson’s trial counsel was not ineffective and Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
motion for a new trial. Because Jackson’s trial counsel was not ineffective and Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1q) and 343.305.” In this case, the trial court opted to sentence London for operating while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253180 - 2020-01-28
(1q) and 343.305.” In this case, the trial court opted to sentence London for operating while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253180 - 2020-01-28
State v. Jeris M. Moore
an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25748 - 2006-08-29
an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25748 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Jackson
for a new trial. Because Jackson’s trial counsel was not ineffective and Jackson was not prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18286 - 2017-09-21
for a new trial. Because Jackson’s trial counsel was not ineffective and Jackson was not prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18286 - 2017-09-21
State v. Vincent Simpson
assault, contrary to § 940.225(1)(b), Stats. Simpson claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8960 - 2005-03-31
assault, contrary to § 940.225(1)(b), Stats. Simpson claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8960 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradford J. May
the judgment. May’s first contention is that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by giving Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12390 - 2005-03-31
the judgment. May’s first contention is that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by giving Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12390 - 2005-03-31
Kerry J. Kowal v. Gregory W. Kowal
the judgment divorcing him from Kerry Kowal. The trial court awarded Kerry the sole legal custody and primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14436 - 2005-03-31
the judgment divorcing him from Kerry Kowal. The trial court awarded Kerry the sole legal custody and primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kerry J. Kowal v. Gregory W. Kowal
CURIAM. Gregory Kowal appeals from the judgment divorcing him from Kerry Kowal. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14436 - 2017-09-21
CURIAM. Gregory Kowal appeals from the judgment divorcing him from Kerry Kowal. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14436 - 2017-09-21
Graham L. Smith v. Pamela Mae Smith
paintings for $300 to a friend and had given many of the rest away to family members, the trial court valued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
paintings for $300 to a friend and had given many of the rest away to family members, the trial court valued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which counsel addressed only the effectiveness of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173356 - 2017-09-21
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which counsel addressed only the effectiveness of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173356 - 2017-09-21