Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55711 - 55720 of 68235 for law.
Search results 55711 - 55720 of 68235 for law.
COURT OF APPEALS
bathroom was constitutionally lawful as incident to Sloan’s arrest. See Chimel, 395 U.S. at 762-63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39275 - 2009-08-10
bathroom was constitutionally lawful as incident to Sloan’s arrest. See Chimel, 395 U.S. at 762-63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39275 - 2009-08-10
City of Middleton v. James H. Parkin
is untimely requires us to construe § 800.14(1), Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10120 - 2005-03-31
is untimely requires us to construe § 800.14(1), Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerome M. Zimmermann
is a question of law, which we decide independently of the circuit court. Id., ¶5. To evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7561 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law, which we decide independently of the circuit court. Id., ¶5. To evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7561 - 2017-09-19
Otto Mogged III v. Margaret A. Mogged
, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3417 - 2005-03-31
, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Evans
was ineffective for not calling his brother and sister-in-law who would have testified that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12406 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for not calling his brother and sister-in-law who would have testified that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12406 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Burke, Sr.
, 280 (Ct. App. 1989). Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
, 280 (Ct. App. 1989). Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100805 - 2017-09-21
fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100805 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to any of its remarks at the original sentencing. The law does not require what Pavin suggests. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
to any of its remarks at the original sentencing. The law does not require what Pavin suggests. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is ‘[not] a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural … law.’” Id. (alteration in original; citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993119 - 2025-08-06
is ‘[not] a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural … law.’” Id. (alteration in original; citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993119 - 2025-08-06