Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55751 - 55760 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 55751 - 55760 of 83958 for simple case search.
Frontsheet
2009 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP917-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
2009 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP917-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
First Bank (N.A.) v. Russell Cleary
guarantee or joint and several liability, in the case of a partnership, from the following individuals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9801 - 2010-08-02
guarantee or joint and several liability, in the case of a partnership, from the following individuals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9801 - 2010-08-02
State v. Jedd T.M.
, appeals from a dispositional order entered by the La Crosse County Circuit Court in three cases, 92-JV-223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9843 - 2007-09-03
, appeals from a dispositional order entered by the La Crosse County Circuit Court in three cases, 92-JV-223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9843 - 2007-09-03
State v. Thomas C. Smith
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2014-02-25
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2014-02-25
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6896 - 2005-03-31
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
been included in the appellant’s appendix. In another case, we sanctioned counsel for certifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
been included in the appellant’s appendix. In another case, we sanctioned counsel for certifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
hearing, Galvin testified that he discussed his case on several occasions with his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56489 - 2014-09-15
hearing, Galvin testified that he discussed his case on several occasions with his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56489 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
hearing and that the victims had 1 In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846805 - 2024-09-06
hearing and that the victims had 1 In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846805 - 2024-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for sanctions under Wis. Stat. § 802.05(3). ¶2 The facts of this case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59343 - 2011-01-26
motion for sanctions under Wis. Stat. § 802.05(3). ¶2 The facts of this case are as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59343 - 2011-01-26