Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5581 - 5590 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5581 - 5590 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Derek A. Miller
petition for supervised release, motion for reconsideration, and request for remedial sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15476 - 2005-03-31
petition for supervised release, motion for reconsideration, and request for remedial sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frederick J. Brissette
“in custody” in § 980.04(2) means in custody pursuant to ch. 980, STATS. Therefore, because Brissette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14317 - 2014-09-15
“in custody” in § 980.04(2) means in custody pursuant to ch. 980, STATS. Therefore, because Brissette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14317 - 2014-09-15
State v. Frederick J. Brissette
“in custody” in § 980.04(2) means in custody pursuant to ch. 980, Stats. Therefore, because Brissette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2006-02-23
“in custody” in § 980.04(2) means in custody pursuant to ch. 980, Stats. Therefore, because Brissette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2006-02-23
[PDF]
The Third Branch, summer 2008
the Fifth and Seventh Judicial Administrative Districts met in Spring Green during May for a joint
/news/thirdbranch/docs/summer08.pdf - 2009-12-02
the Fifth and Seventh Judicial Administrative Districts met in Spring Green during May for a joint
/news/thirdbranch/docs/summer08.pdf - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court calendar and case synopses - September 2021
to the abdomen. A jury found Garcia guilty. Garcia filed a post-conviction motion in which he argued
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopssep2021.pdf - 2021-09-27
to the abdomen. A jury found Garcia guilty. Garcia filed a post-conviction motion in which he argued
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopssep2021.pdf - 2021-09-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31116 - 2014-09-15
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31116 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2011-01-30
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2011-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Wittmann argues the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254453 - 2020-02-18
and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Wittmann argues the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254453 - 2020-02-18
[PDF]
WI App 55
. The circuit court denied the motion, and MEA continued to pursue its records request. ¶2 The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990122 - 2025-10-09
. The circuit court denied the motion, and MEA continued to pursue its records request. ¶2 The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990122 - 2025-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or subsequent offense. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion wherein he sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655477 - 2023-05-17
or subsequent offense. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion wherein he sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655477 - 2023-05-17