Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5581 - 5590 of 57315 for id.
Search results 5581 - 5590 of 57315 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See id. ¶12 “[I]n a motion for resentencing based on a [trial] court’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74075 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See id. ¶12 “[I]n a motion for resentencing based on a [trial] court’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74075 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is satisfied. Id. We turn first to whether Fernandez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is satisfied. Id. We turn first to whether Fernandez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
missing material that is necessary for our review, supports the [trial] court’s determination.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45802 - 2014-09-15
missing material that is necessary for our review, supports the [trial] court’s determination.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45802 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffery L. Watson
. Instead, the appellate court independently determines the questions of “constitutional” fact. Id. at 190
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
. Instead, the appellate court independently determines the questions of “constitutional” fact. Id. at 190
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
0.00. Id., ¶11. In the event of such an administrative suspension, the driver may request a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636840 - 2023-03-23
0.00. Id., ¶11. In the event of such an administrative suspension, the driver may request a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636840 - 2023-03-23
[PDF]
State v. Tilford O. Thompson
determination if there is a reasonable basis for the ruling. See id. The admissibility of other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11747 - 2017-09-20
determination if there is a reasonable basis for the ruling. See id. The admissibility of other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11747 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
favoring the validity of the law. See id. A challenger must prove the statute unconstitutional beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36247 - 2014-09-15
favoring the validity of the law. See id. A challenger must prove the statute unconstitutional beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36247 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 190
which may be decided without deference to the lower court’s determinations. Id. at 547. ¶5 A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
which may be decided without deference to the lower court’s determinations. Id. at 547. ¶5 A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for us to meaningfully review the trial court’s denial” of Kurtz’s pretrial motion. Id. We reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39573 - 2014-09-15
for us to meaningfully review the trial court’s denial” of Kurtz’s pretrial motion. Id. We reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39573 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a reasonable belief that criminal activity was afoot. Id. at 55. The fundamental focus is reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29083 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable belief that criminal activity was afoot. Id. at 55. The fundamental focus is reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29083 - 2014-09-15