Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55851 - 55860 of 59585 for do.

State v. George C. Lohmeier
of this case, we do not reach the equal protection issue. We answer the first question articulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8028 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael Love
of interest adversely affected his or her lawyer’s performance. Id. However, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12875 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott A. Morgan
way to do so is if the initial sentence was illegal. In order to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7972 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
doctrine.7 Accordingly, because this issue is dispositive, we do not address the community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902001 - 2025-01-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“boy parts,” “peed” in her mouth but told her that it was not pee and to “keep doing it” or “keep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234280 - 2019-02-07

[PDF] NOTICE
would have accused him of this conduct, but believed it might had had something to do with his catching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15

State v. Patrick Greer
recollection of why he did not do so. As part of a plea agreement, Libke testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12385 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael Marks
prejudice under the erroneous impression that it was required to do so because the statute did not specify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] First Federal Savings Bank v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
; or that LIRC's findings of fact do not support its order or award. See § 102.23(1)(e), STATS. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7706 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
to amend the caption to shield his identity but he did not do so. Potkonjak cannot seek sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163872 - 2017-09-21