Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55861 - 55870 of 74898 for public records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
intentional homicide.3 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669284 - 2023-06-21

State v. Joachim E. Dressler
to seizure and admission of protected materials. If the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07

COURT OF APPEALS
sought clarification of the record because the circuit court’s decision on the motion did not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14

[PDF] Eau Claire County v. Tamara J. Knuth
. There is no indication in the record, however, that Knuth cited Renz to the trial court, or that she argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15480 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Raymond Massie
in the record to suggest that dismissal of the habitual offender enhancer was the only basis for Massie’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13922 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
records the previous No. 2019AP1908-CR 4 thirty seconds leading up to the activation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402560 - 2021-07-30

Gregory W. Schaefer v. Barbara Conway
, there is no evidence in the record that any of the other factors created a fiduciary relationship.[4] The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Carrie M.W.
). This court must search the record to find evidence supporting the verdict and accept all inferences drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5783 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
is supported by the record; (2) if the issue presents a legal question as to whether the undisputed facts here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05

Quality Investments, Inc. v. Board of Review of the City of Superior
court erroneously considered evidence outside the record in denying Quality’s motion to vacate. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4581 - 2005-03-31