Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5591 - 5600 of 29942 for des.
Search results 5591 - 5600 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
which we review de novo. Id. However, whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47800 - 2014-09-15
which we review de novo. Id. However, whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2014AP513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116325 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2014AP513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116325 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.1 William Thomas appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83139 - 2014-09-15
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.1 William Thomas appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83139 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Vances H. Smith v. Gary R. McCaughtry
). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. Blackbourne v. School Dist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10239 - 2017-09-20
). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. Blackbourne v. School Dist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10239 - 2017-09-20
Kurt Ohrmundt v. Greg Demark
summary judgment. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. In conducting our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13610 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. In conducting our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13610 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
., de novo. Cook v. Continental Cas., 180 Wis.2d 237, 244, 509 N.W.2d 100, 103 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9063 - 2017-09-19
., de novo. Cook v. Continental Cas., 180 Wis.2d 237, 244, 509 N.W.2d 100, 103 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9063 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are “substantial” presents a question of law which we review de novo. Jalovec v. Jalovec, 2007 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
are “substantial” presents a question of law which we review de novo. Jalovec v. Jalovec, 2007 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146093 - 2015-08-12
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146093 - 2015-08-12
Leroy Gilbert v. American Family Insurance
forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., de novo. Cook v. Continental Cas. Co., 180 Wis.2d 237, 244-45, 509 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9376 - 2005-03-31
forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., de novo. Cook v. Continental Cas. Co., 180 Wis.2d 237, 244-45, 509 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 9
); see also Klimas v. State, 75 Wis. 2d 244, 251-53, 249 N.W.2d 285 (1977). We apply de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131544 - 2017-09-21
); see also Klimas v. State, 75 Wis. 2d 244, 251-53, 249 N.W.2d 285 (1977). We apply de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131544 - 2017-09-21