Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5591 - 5600 of 69092 for he.

State v. James D. Lammers
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises claims related to what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of possessing illegal drugs, and one count of possessing an electric weapon. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27161 - 2006-11-15

[PDF] State v. Leonard R. Avery
. No. 2005AP1447 2 based on newly discovered evidence. Avery claims he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21746 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tony B. Oliver
for delivery of cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(cm)1.[1] He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5290 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Chad E. Lamberies
. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney in that case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20539 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, to which he pled guilty. He also appeals from an order of the trial court denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250587 - 2019-11-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21

State v. Stanley A. Otis
to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent law.[2] When he asked Otis whether he would submit to a chemical breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronan T. Heaney
that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. He argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6168 - 2017-09-19

State v. Chad E. Lamberies
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05