Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55901 - 55910 of 69882 for as he.

COURT OF APPEALS
viewed adult images for one minute and seven seconds; and (3) that Zellner acknowledged he had done so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33475 - 2008-07-22

[PDF] WI App 22
identified as Robert T. Robert T. admitted making the call, saying that he did it because “[h]e was bored
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31483 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant ‘knows what [s]he is doing and [her] choice is made with [her] eyes open.’” Id., ¶16 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71316 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
noticing problems with the bathroom, he sued the Davises in small claims court. Brabender alleged, among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32402 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Shannon K.
of protective services. He was placed in foster care in January 2000, and was found to be in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3777 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Floyd J. Van Asten v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
5 if “[t]he jury verdict as approved by the court under s. 32.05(11) exceeds the jurisdictional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11032 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 100
and Mary in Thomas’s interest in the property he had held in joint tenancy with Robert. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99897 - 2017-09-21

Town of Sugar Creek v. City of Elkhorn
in Urban Planning at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee and an urban planning consultant. He opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14439 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” (Emphasis added.) “[T]he service on counsel for the opposite party of a notice of retainer and appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247663 - 2019-10-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. He sought attorney’s fees of $44,534.50, and asked the trial court to double that amount because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89385 - 2014-09-15