Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55921 - 55930 of 61714 for judgment.
Search results 55921 - 55930 of 61714 for judgment.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to reconsider which presents the same issues as those determined in the order or judgment sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617315 - 2023-02-01
a motion to reconsider which presents the same issues as those determined in the order or judgment sought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617315 - 2023-02-01
Brown County v. April O.
parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. STANDARD OF REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3419 - 2005-03-31
parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. STANDARD OF REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3419 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Fullmer’s pleas and entry of the judgment of conviction. The case was transferred to the Hon. Daniel S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145303 - 2015-07-29
of Fullmer’s pleas and entry of the judgment of conviction. The case was transferred to the Hon. Daniel S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145303 - 2015-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29476 - 2007-06-25
as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what is right and proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29476 - 2007-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, after which the circuit court limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205287 - 2017-12-14
. ¶7 The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, after which the circuit court limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205287 - 2017-12-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not a final judgment ready for appeal. Downey’s untimely appeal was voluntarily withdrawn and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112074 - 2017-09-21
was not a final judgment ready for appeal. Downey’s untimely appeal was voluntarily withdrawn and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112074 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and entered the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Michael B. Brennan presided over numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29262 - 2014-09-15
, and entered the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Michael B. Brennan presided over numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29262 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
you’ve done …. Since judgment was entered, Dutton has filed at least a dozen motions in which he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143668 - 2015-06-29
you’ve done …. Since judgment was entered, Dutton has filed at least a dozen motions in which he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143668 - 2015-06-29
CA Blank Order
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108969 - 2014-03-09
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108969 - 2014-03-09
State v. Gerald D. Taylor
, again raising sentencing issues. We affirmed the judgment of conviction on July 19, 2002, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31
, again raising sentencing issues. We affirmed the judgment of conviction on July 19, 2002, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31