Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 561 - 570 of 29810 for des.
Search results 561 - 570 of 29810 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment. Lacy demanded a de novo proceeding before the circuit court. The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32407 - 2008-04-09
for summary judgment. Lacy demanded a de novo proceeding before the circuit court. The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32407 - 2008-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560883 - 2022-08-30
from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560883 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
Wis. 2d 883, 653 N.W.2d 309 (despite de novo review, we benefit from the circuit court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6764 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 883, 653 N.W.2d 309 (despite de novo review, we benefit from the circuit court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6764 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Krier
of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
. Rebecca requested a de novo hearing before the trial court. The trial court determined that although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12927 - 2005-03-31
. Rebecca requested a de novo hearing before the trial court. The trial court determined that although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12927 - 2005-03-31