Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 561 - 570 of 29713 for des.
Search results 561 - 570 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
Behrndt appeals from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing his demand for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31
Behrndt appeals from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing his demand for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
for a trial de novo and awarding John and Gail Hernandez (the Hernandezes) attorney’s fees. Behrndt argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3515 - 2017-09-19
for a trial de novo and awarding John and Gail Hernandez (the Hernandezes) attorney’s fees. Behrndt argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3515 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
(1), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2560 - 2005-03-31
(1), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2560 - 2005-03-31
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
. Rebecca requested a de novo hearing before the trial court. The trial court determined that although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12927 - 2005-03-31
. Rebecca requested a de novo hearing before the trial court. The trial court determined that although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12927 - 2005-03-31
Howard R. Wagner v. County of Burnett
to intervene de novo, deciding whether the requirements for intervention have been met without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13468 - 2005-03-31
to intervene de novo, deciding whether the requirements for intervention have been met without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13468 - 2005-03-31