Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5601 - 5610 of 36003 for affidavit of mailing.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Clarence argues that the court did not consider all of his affidavits itemizing fees and costs. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559111 - 2022-08-25

Alexandra Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc.
to withdraw. In a supporting affidavit, the attorney stated that NCI had consistently failed to cooperate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3242 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alexandra Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc.
, NCI’s attorney, Harry Hertel, filed a motion to withdraw. In a supporting affidavit, the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3242 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Sharon Caldwell v. J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc.
undisputed facts are contained in the parties’ affidavits. Findorff was the general contractor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17847 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is Van Handel’s January 2021 affidavit. In the circuit court, Federated contended that the January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581237 - 2022-10-25

State v. Clemente Lamont Alexander
and for his failure to call them as witnesses at trial. His motion included affidavits from both Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17821 - 2005-04-18

[PDF] WI APP 55
on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35704 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Clemente Lamont Alexander
and Winters and for his failure to call them as witnesses at trial. His motion included affidavits from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17821 - 2017-09-21

Sharon Caldwell v. J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc.
in the parties’ affidavits. Findorff was the general contractor for the construction of Yahara Elementary School
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17847 - 2005-05-02

2007 WI APP 207
, taken from the Seiferts’ petition and from affidavits filed on the parties’ behalf, are not in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30106 - 2007-09-25