Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5601 - 5610 of 68275 for did.
Search results 5601 - 5610 of 68275 for did.
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move to withdraw his plea before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move to withdraw his plea before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 55
a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36849 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36849 - 2014-09-15
Carl I. Nelson, Jr. v. Charlotte A. Nelson
it did not. We affirm. ¶2 The trial court divided the property 80/20 in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2586 - 2005-03-31
it did not. We affirm. ¶2 The trial court divided the property 80/20 in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The only issue on appeal is whether Luccarini’s trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing when he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161791 - 2017-09-21
. The only issue on appeal is whether Luccarini’s trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing when he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of 2 Peterson did not raise his objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479770 - 2022-02-03
assistance of 2 Peterson did not raise his objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479770 - 2022-02-03
State v. Levi Hogner
-third offense). Hogner maintains that the initial sentence was illegal because it did not impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12321 - 2005-03-31
-third offense). Hogner maintains that the initial sentence was illegal because it did not impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis M. Stanton
to submit to the test. We hold that the trial court did not do so and affirm. NO. 96-3245-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11686 - 2014-09-15
to submit to the test. We hold that the trial court did not do so and affirm. NO. 96-3245-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11686 - 2014-09-15