Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5601 - 5610 of 17542 for ex.
Search results 5601 - 5610 of 17542 for ex.
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
11-04-2014 Affirmed 2013AP002029 State ex rel. Cleveland Lee v. Denise Symdon1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132974 - 2015-01-11
11-04-2014 Affirmed 2013AP002029 State ex rel. Cleveland Lee v. Denise Symdon1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132974 - 2015-01-11
[PDF]
Quinn Johnson v. Michael J. Sullivan
DISTRICT IV STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. QUINN JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2820 - 2017-09-19
DISTRICT IV STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. QUINN JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2820 - 2017-09-19
Rusk County Department of Health and Human Services v. Leonard M. Thorson
role is to give effect to the plain meaning of the words in the statute. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7632 - 2005-03-31
role is to give effect to the plain meaning of the words in the statute. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7632 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relating to the repeater enhancer applied to his sentences. See State ex rel. Robertson v. Circuit Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
relating to the repeater enhancer applied to his sentences. See State ex rel. Robertson v. Circuit Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not indulge in inferences wholly unsupported by any evidence,” State ex rel. Kanieski v. Gagnon, 54 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
not indulge in inferences wholly unsupported by any evidence,” State ex rel. Kanieski v. Gagnon, 54 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
State v. Glen P. Walker
of treatment and parole. These arguments were recently rejected in State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12515 - 2005-03-31
of treatment and parole. These arguments were recently rejected in State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and a single opportunity to raise claims of error .…” State ex rel. Macemon v. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33662 - 2014-09-15
and a single opportunity to raise claims of error .…” State ex rel. Macemon v. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33662 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12);1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12);1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and a single opportunity to raise claims of error .…” State ex rel. Macemon v. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37057 - 2014-09-15
and a single opportunity to raise claims of error .…” State ex rel. Macemon v. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37057 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Citing State ex rel. Tate v. Schwartz, 2002 WI 127, 257 Wis. 2d 240, 654 N.W.2d 438, Webb argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53701 - 2010-08-23
Citing State ex rel. Tate v. Schwartz, 2002 WI 127, 257 Wis. 2d 240, 654 N.W.2d 438, Webb argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53701 - 2010-08-23