Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56001 - 56010 of 68257 for law.
Search results 56001 - 56010 of 68257 for law.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the maximum authorized by law. See State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265, ¶18, 240 Wis. 2d 95, 622
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665145 - 2023-06-07
the maximum authorized by law. See State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265, ¶18, 240 Wis. 2d 95, 622
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665145 - 2023-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Roger E. Smiley
discusses whether the guilty and no contest pleas were taken in accordance with Wisconsin law, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13637 - 2017-09-21
discusses whether the guilty and no contest pleas were taken in accordance with Wisconsin law, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13637 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Monroe v. Robert A. Patterson
that Patterson had a scar on his head. Whether the facts constitute probable cause is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12225 - 2017-09-21
that Patterson had a scar on his head. Whether the facts constitute probable cause is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible No. 2009AP229-CR 3 options are virtually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46435 - 2014-09-15
investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible No. 2009AP229-CR 3 options are virtually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46435 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Romaine A. Langham
requires that we “faithfully give effect to the laws enacted by the legislature.” In doing so, “[w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25668 - 2017-09-21
requires that we “faithfully give effect to the laws enacted by the legislature.” In doing so, “[w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25668 - 2017-09-21
State v. Troy Lee Perkins
.” Although Perkins cites no case law relating to statutory ambiguity, he is essentially arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26198 - 2006-08-14
.” Although Perkins cites no case law relating to statutory ambiguity, he is essentially arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26198 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the sixty-year range authorized by law. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.02(1), 939.50(3)(b). “A sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746561 - 2024-01-03
the sixty-year range authorized by law. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.02(1), 939.50(3)(b). “A sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746561 - 2024-01-03
COURT OF APPEALS
consecutive sentences were necessary. The sentences imposed were far less than the maximum allowed by law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01
consecutive sentences were necessary. The sentences imposed were far less than the maximum allowed by law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68842 - 2011-08-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the parties litigated whether the District violated laws protecting Mohammed’s civil rights by (1) refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40021 - 2014-09-15
, the parties litigated whether the District violated laws protecting Mohammed’s civil rights by (1) refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40021 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Madison, WI 53703 J. Steven House House Law Office 222 S. Hamilton Street, Ste. 12 Madison, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157366 - 2017-09-21
Madison, WI 53703 J. Steven House House Law Office 222 S. Hamilton Street, Ste. 12 Madison, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157366 - 2017-09-21