Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56011 - 56020 of 61714 for judgment.
Search results 56011 - 56020 of 61714 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed Coleman’s judgment of conviction in December 1993. ¶4 Coleman took no further action until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
affirmed Coleman’s judgment of conviction in December 1993. ¶4 Coleman took no further action until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its will and not its judgment; and (4) supported by evidence such that the board might reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992407 - 2025-08-06
its will and not its judgment; and (4) supported by evidence such that the board might reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992407 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6896 - 2017-09-20
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6896 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
acquaintance with one of the investigating detectives. In our order summarily affirming Brown’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30037 - 2014-09-15
acquaintance with one of the investigating detectives. In our order summarily affirming Brown’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30037 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111233 - 2017-09-21
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111233 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
) its action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable, representing its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19
) its action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable, representing its will and not its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dale W. Repinski
that counsel rendered adequate assistance and exercised reasonable professional judgment in making all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10179 - 2017-09-19
that counsel rendered adequate assistance and exercised reasonable professional judgment in making all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10179 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Janice Mack v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
are exempt even from post-judgment garnishment might bear on the wisdom of reducing current State SSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15228 - 2017-09-21
are exempt even from post-judgment garnishment might bear on the wisdom of reducing current State SSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15228 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dale W. Repinski
and exercised reasonable professional judgment in making all significant decisions. Id. at 690. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10179 - 2005-03-31
and exercised reasonable professional judgment in making all significant decisions. Id. at 690. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10179 - 2005-03-31
January 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
. 12-22-2005 Judgment affirmed; order affirmed/reversed/remanded 2004AP001922 K. Andreah
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21328 - 2006-02-06
. 12-22-2005 Judgment affirmed; order affirmed/reversed/remanded 2004AP001922 K. Andreah
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21328 - 2006-02-06