Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56031 - 56040 of 69114 for he.
Search results 56031 - 56040 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Bobby R. Williams
conducted a plea colloquy with Williams before accepting the plea. On October 30, 2003, he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19729 - 2017-09-21
conducted a plea colloquy with Williams before accepting the plea. On October 30, 2003, he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19729 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of conviction to remove the provision ordering that his phone was subject to forfeiture. He argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857006 - 2024-10-02
of conviction to remove the provision ordering that his phone was subject to forfeiture. He argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857006 - 2024-10-02
Certification
. Stat. § 51.35(1)(e), he was entitled to a hearing within ten days of transfer. Samuel requested
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86770 - 2012-09-04
. Stat. § 51.35(1)(e), he was entitled to a hearing within ten days of transfer. Samuel requested
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86770 - 2012-09-04
State v. Casey J. Schneck
Schneck’s argument is simple and straightforward. He correctly observes that forfeiture actions are civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
Schneck’s argument is simple and straightforward. He correctly observes that forfeiture actions are civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
David L. Gilbert v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. § 71.75(5) because he did not file it within two years after notice of the assessment under the controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2903 - 2005-03-31
. § 71.75(5) because he did not file it within two years after notice of the assessment under the controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2903 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the decision did not involve policy concerns because “[t]he decision merely substituted private employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29993 - 2007-08-15
that the decision did not involve policy concerns because “[t]he decision merely substituted private employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29993 - 2007-08-15
Ronald J. Taylor v. West American Insurance Company
homes, when Collins, a crane operator employed by T&K Helgesen, dropped a beam, which he was unloading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14780 - 2005-03-31
homes, when Collins, a crane operator employed by T&K Helgesen, dropped a beam, which he was unloading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14780 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of protection or services with a dispositional order. He had been out of the No. 2018AP1291 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246011 - 2019-09-04
of protection or services with a dispositional order. He had been out of the No. 2018AP1291 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246011 - 2019-09-04
Babette Grunow v. The UWM Post
court’s decision was “without legal basis or merit” and alleges that “[t]he ruling of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-03-31
court’s decision was “without legal basis or merit” and alleges that “[t]he ruling of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Solberg
., in violation of § 940.225(3), Stats. He argues that: (1) the trial court prevented him from presenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8584 - 2005-03-31
., in violation of § 940.225(3), Stats. He argues that: (1) the trial court prevented him from presenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8584 - 2005-03-31