Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56031 - 56040 of 61714 for judgment.
Search results 56031 - 56040 of 61714 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
the Board’s action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85909 - 2012-08-13
the Board’s action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85909 - 2012-08-13
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
attempts to portray his failure to remove the toy from his pocket as an “error of judgment” or a “mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13357 - 2005-03-31
attempts to portray his failure to remove the toy from his pocket as an “error of judgment” or a “mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13357 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“is proven by a judgment of conviction arising from conduct underlying an allegation.” Thus, the reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
“is proven by a judgment of conviction arising from conduct underlying an allegation.” Thus, the reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on all questions necessary to support a judgment on a particular claim.”). Further, Jimmy J. points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118898 - 2014-09-15
on all questions necessary to support a judgment on a particular claim.”). Further, Jimmy J. points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118898 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in effect affirming a municipal-court judgment finding him guilty on the parties’ stipulated facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33962 - 2008-09-08
in effect affirming a municipal-court judgment finding him guilty on the parties’ stipulated facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33962 - 2008-09-08
Louis Salimes v. Town of Caledonia Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9461 - 2005-03-31
action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. April O.
and Steven’s parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. Nos. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3418 - 2017-09-19
and Steven’s parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. Nos. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3418 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County v. April O.
and Steven’s parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. Nos. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3419 - 2017-09-19
and Steven’s parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. Nos. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3419 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20
not trigger a Klessig colloquy. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Nos. 03-2508-CR 03-2509-CR 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and represented the agency’s will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence presented reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58975 - 2014-09-15
and represented the agency’s will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence presented reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58975 - 2014-09-15