Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56031 - 56040 of 68257 for law.
Search results 56031 - 56040 of 68257 for law.
State v. Mark H.K.
). The interpretation of a statute and its application to a set of facts are questions of law we review de novo. Reyes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
). The interpretation of a statute and its application to a set of facts are questions of law we review de novo. Reyes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
Marian R. Crosswhite v. Deborah L. Zivko
In reviewing a trial court's findings of facts and conclusions of law, we will not set aside the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9495 - 2005-03-31
In reviewing a trial court's findings of facts and conclusions of law, we will not set aside the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9495 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
or constitutional muster is a question of law this court reviews independently. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7596 - 2005-03-31
or constitutional muster is a question of law this court reviews independently. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7596 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Kaminski
of law. See id. at 791, 589 N.W.2d at 680-81. Matusiak’s testimony would have assisted the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13986 - 2005-03-31
of law. See id. at 791, 589 N.W.2d at 680-81. Matusiak’s testimony would have assisted the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13986 - 2005-03-31
Otto Mogged III v. Margaret A. Mogged
, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3417 - 2005-03-31
, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Evans
was ineffective for not calling his brother and sister-in-law who would have testified that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12406 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for not calling his brother and sister-in-law who would have testified that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12406 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Burke, Sr.
, 280 (Ct. App. 1989). Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
, 280 (Ct. App. 1989). Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10657 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100805 - 2017-09-21
fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100805 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is ‘[not] a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural … law.’” Id. (alteration in original; citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993119 - 2025-08-06
is ‘[not] a license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural … law.’” Id. (alteration in original; citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993119 - 2025-08-06