Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56061 - 56070 of 77641 for j o e y ' s.
Search results 56061 - 56070 of 77641 for j o e y ' s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court expunged Zeamer’s conviction. “[E]xpunction of a conviction merely deletes the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364489 - 2021-05-12
court expunged Zeamer’s conviction. “[E]xpunction of a conviction merely deletes the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364489 - 2021-05-12
[PDF]
County of Oneida v. Donald L. Clarksen
from a judgment of the circuit court for Oneida County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15606 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Oneida County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15606 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion absent “a sufficient reason why his current ‘spin’ on th[e] already adjudicated issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-08
postconviction motion absent “a sufficient reason why his current ‘spin’ on th[e] already adjudicated issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-08
Mark R. Voss v. Sentry Insurance
court for Milwaukee County: JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11246 - 2005-03-31
court for Milwaukee County: JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11246 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. Schultz
. And it's time for him to suffer some of the consequences. [W]e can take a week and you can come up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19
. And it's time for him to suffer some of the consequences. [W]e can take a week and you can come up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision for a Class H felony); 961.41(1m)(e)3. (classifying possession with intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136651 - 2026-06-23
years’ extended supervision for a Class H felony); 961.41(1m)(e)3. (classifying possession with intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136651 - 2026-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(e)4. (classifying the delivery of more than 50 grams of methamphetamine as a Class
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119760 - 2026-05-19
. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(e)4. (classifying the delivery of more than 50 grams of methamphetamine as a Class
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119760 - 2026-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, “employee” is defined under the statute as “[e]very person in the service of another under any contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43890 - 2009-11-23
, “employee” is defined under the statute as “[e]very person in the service of another under any contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43890 - 2009-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
potential applicability was that “[h]e did not foresee [Dubose’s] subsequent effect” (essentially because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
potential applicability was that “[h]e did not foresee [Dubose’s] subsequent effect” (essentially because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(e)3. with the same maximum penalty. No. 2023AP349-CRNM 5 2000 WI 123, ¶24, 239
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756532 - 2024-01-30
)(e)3. with the same maximum penalty. No. 2023AP349-CRNM 5 2000 WI 123, ¶24, 239
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756532 - 2024-01-30