Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56071 - 56080 of 77644 for j o e y ' s.
Search results 56071 - 56080 of 77644 for j o e y ' s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision for a Class H felony); 961.41(1m)(e)3. (classifying possession with intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1126841 - 2026-06-09
years’ extended supervision for a Class H felony); 961.41(1m)(e)3. (classifying possession with intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1126841 - 2026-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co., 38 Wis. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80273 - 2012-04-02
v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co., 38 Wis. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80273 - 2012-04-02
State v. Mark Anthony Mitchell
because her son was a cop in Cal[e]donia. She knew what he was going through and had gone through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13848 - 2005-03-31
because her son was a cop in Cal[e]donia. She knew what he was going through and had gone through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
of the attorneys testified as follows regarding his partner’s and his own interactions with Penigar: [H]e’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
of the attorneys testified as follows regarding his partner’s and his own interactions with Penigar: [H]e’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: edward e. leineweber, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29449 - 2007-06-20
: edward e. leineweber, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29449 - 2007-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion absent “a sufficient reason why his current ‘spin’ on th[e] already adjudicated issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-08
postconviction motion absent “a sufficient reason why his current ‘spin’ on th[e] already adjudicated issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-08
Mark R. Voss v. Sentry Insurance
court for Milwaukee County: JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11246 - 2005-03-31
court for Milwaukee County: JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11246 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. Schultz
. And it's time for him to suffer some of the consequences. [W]e can take a week and you can come up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19
. And it's time for him to suffer some of the consequences. [W]e can take a week and you can come up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision for a Class H felony); 961.41(1m)(e)3. (classifying possession with intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136651 - 2026-06-23
years’ extended supervision for a Class H felony); 961.41(1m)(e)3. (classifying possession with intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136651 - 2026-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(e)4. (classifying the delivery of more than 50 grams of methamphetamine as a Class
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119760 - 2026-05-19
. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(e)4. (classifying the delivery of more than 50 grams of methamphetamine as a Class
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119760 - 2026-05-19