Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 68502 for did.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the sentence it imposed “did not reflect [its] intent as far as a fair sentence in this case” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
that the sentence it imposed “did not reflect [its] intent as far as a fair sentence in this case” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends that the evidence did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29943 - 2014-09-15
contends that the evidence did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Phillip K. Adams
because the trial court did not establish an adequate factual basis for conviction before accepting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10118 - 2017-09-19
because the trial court did not establish an adequate factual basis for conviction before accepting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10118 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rick A. Knutson
that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to believe that he was committing an offense. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2005-03-31
that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to believe that he was committing an offense. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff who pulled his car over to investigate did not have a reasonable suspicion that he was engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131706 - 2017-09-21
sheriff who pulled his car over to investigate did not have a reasonable suspicion that he was engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the assault occurred. At the preliminary hearing, Grendziak testified as follows: Q: Did you see him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210636 - 2018-04-03
the assault occurred. At the preliminary hearing, Grendziak testified as follows: Q: Did you see him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210636 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
Nos. 96-1694-CR 96-1695-CR 2 in sentencing Armstrong. Because Armstrong did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
State v. Phillip K. Adams
injustice has occurred because the trial court did not establish an adequate factual basis for conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10118 - 2005-03-31
injustice has occurred because the trial court did not establish an adequate factual basis for conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10118 - 2005-03-31