Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 68485 for did.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 68485 for did.
Melvin Raymond Smith, Jr. v. Linda Ann Smith
to specify the amount of equalization payment, did not provide sufficient reasons for adopting Linda’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13886 - 2005-03-31
to specify the amount of equalization payment, did not provide sufficient reasons for adopting Linda’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13886 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rick A. Knutson
that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to believe that he was committing an offense. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2005-03-31
that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to believe that he was committing an offense. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the sentence it imposed “did not reflect [its] intent as far as a fair sentence in this case” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
that the sentence it imposed “did not reflect [its] intent as far as a fair sentence in this case” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 55
a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36849 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Hudson Diesel v. Rose Ottum
notified Hudson Diesel that its counsel recommended against the waiver, but the board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7175 - 2017-09-20
notified Hudson Diesel that its counsel recommended against the waiver, but the board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7175 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not make any of the findings required by Langlade County v. D.J.W., 2020 WI 41, ¶40, 391 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964101 - 2025-05-30
did not make any of the findings required by Langlade County v. D.J.W., 2020 WI 41, ¶40, 391 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964101 - 2025-05-30
Hudson Diesel v. Rose Ottum
Hudson Diesel that its counsel recommended against the waiver, but the board did not specifically rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7175 - 2005-03-31
Hudson Diesel that its counsel recommended against the waiver, but the board did not specifically rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7175 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the assault occurred. At the preliminary hearing, Grendziak testified as follows: Q: Did you see him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210636 - 2018-04-03
the assault occurred. At the preliminary hearing, Grendziak testified as follows: Q: Did you see him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210636 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends that the evidence did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29943 - 2014-09-15
contends that the evidence did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29943 - 2014-09-15