Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 68869 for he.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 68869 for he.
State v. Leonard R. Avery
discovered evidence. Avery claims he should be granted a new trial because: (1) the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21746 - 2006-03-13
discovered evidence. Avery claims he should be granted a new trial because: (1) the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21746 - 2006-03-13
State v. Chad E. Lamberies
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals from an order denying his pro se motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87402 - 2012-09-24
. He also appeals from an order denying his pro se motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87402 - 2012-09-24
State v. Anthony M. Reynolds
), 943.32(1)(a), 941.30(1), 940.30 and 949.23(1), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
), 943.32(1)(a), 941.30(1), 940.30 and 949.23(1), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a controlled substance (OWI), contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244810 - 2019-08-06
of a controlled substance (OWI), contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244810 - 2019-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with blankets. The next morning he sent their children off to school and went to work. Upon returning home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226342 - 2018-11-07
with blankets. The next morning he sent their children off to school and went to work. Upon returning home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226342 - 2018-11-07
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
. Stat. § 940.19(5) (1999–2000), and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
. Stat. § 940.19(5) (1999–2000), and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. 1 He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21