Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 72985 for petition.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 72985 for petition.
[PDF]
Kim J. Barksdale v. Jon Litscher
Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. KIM J. BARKSDALE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6326 - 2017-09-19
Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. KIM J. BARKSDALE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6326 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781486 - 2024-03-28
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781486 - 2024-03-28
Kim J. Barksdale v. Jon Litscher
Title of Case: State of Wisconsin ex rel. Kim J. Barksdale, Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6326 - 2005-03-31
Title of Case: State of Wisconsin ex rel. Kim J. Barksdale, Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6326 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61789 - 2014-09-15
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61789 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to support his or her petition.” Wis. Stat. § 980.075(4). Neither section requires the petitioner to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61789 - 2011-03-29
to support his or her petition.” Wis. Stat. § 980.075(4). Neither section requires the petitioner to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61789 - 2011-03-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing the evidence on the petition,” shall determine whether the petitioner proved his innocence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992743 - 2025-08-05
hearing the evidence on the petition,” shall determine whether the petitioner proved his innocence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992743 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his petition for conditional release. His appellate counsel, Dustin C. Haskell, filed a no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744283 - 2023-12-27
his petition for conditional release. His appellate counsel, Dustin C. Haskell, filed a no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744283 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
appeal rights had expired in 1999. In May 2023, Smart filed a petition for writ of coram nobis. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060062 - 2026-01-14
appeal rights had expired in 1999. In May 2023, Smart filed a petition for writ of coram nobis. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060062 - 2026-01-14
[PDF]
24-05 - Interested Persons Communication
Via E-mail Distribution Re: Rule Petition 24-05, Attorney Assessments for Public Interest Legal
/supreme/docs/2405interestedpersons.pdf - 2024-09-05
Via E-mail Distribution Re: Rule Petition 24-05, Attorney Assessments for Public Interest Legal
/supreme/docs/2405interestedpersons.pdf - 2024-09-05
[PDF]
24-04 - Interested Persons Communication
Via E-mail Distribution Re: Rule Petition 24-04, Amending Chapter 31 re CLE Credit for Cultural
/supreme/docs/2404interestedpersons.pdf - 2024-09-05
Via E-mail Distribution Re: Rule Petition 24-04, Amending Chapter 31 re CLE Credit for Cultural
/supreme/docs/2404interestedpersons.pdf - 2024-09-05