Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 74557 for public records.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 74557 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Barry A. Vann
on the record a sufficient factual basis for his plea. We disagree. After sentencing, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18739 - 2017-09-21
on the record a sufficient factual basis for his plea. We disagree. After sentencing, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18739 - 2017-09-21
State v. Barry A. Vann
his plea because it did not establish on the record a sufficient factual basis for his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18739 - 2013-02-11
his plea because it did not establish on the record a sufficient factual basis for his plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18739 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233078 - 2019-01-23
committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233078 - 2019-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Gregory M. Weber Assistant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Gregory M. Weber Assistant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a matter of public record. ¶13 This court has explained that, for a claim of public disclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720184 - 2023-10-26
as a matter of public record. ¶13 This court has explained that, for a claim of public disclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720184 - 2023-10-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
office. She also pointed to a post-March 21 letter from what we assume from the Record is an employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26884 - 2014-09-15
office. She also pointed to a post-March 21 letter from what we assume from the Record is an employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 66
that “the majority of the reclamation plan” met the requisite intent. The record does not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172095 - 2017-09-21
that “the majority of the reclamation plan” met the requisite intent. The record does not suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 34
, 2020, the Honorable Kevin Martens, on behalf of the Director of State Courts' Records Management
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356640 - 2021-04-13
, 2020, the Honorable Kevin Martens, on behalf of the Director of State Courts' Records Management
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356640 - 2021-04-13
[PDF]
WI 34
, 2020, the Honorable Kevin Martens, on behalf of the Director of State Courts' Records Management
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356640 - 2021-04-13
, 2020, the Honorable Kevin Martens, on behalf of the Director of State Courts' Records Management
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356640 - 2021-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
and admissible as certified copies of public records under § 909.02(4) (“Extrinsic evidence of authenticity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22
and admissible as certified copies of public records under § 909.02(4) (“Extrinsic evidence of authenticity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22