Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5621 - 5630 of 69114 for he.
Search results 5621 - 5630 of 69114 for he.
State v. James D. Lammers
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises claims related to what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises claims related to what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28
Christopher B. v. Timothy L. Schoeneck
The underlying facts are essentially undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15148 - 2005-03-31
The underlying facts are essentially undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation revocation proceedings took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation revocation proceedings took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals from an order denying his pro se motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87402 - 2012-09-24
. He also appeals from an order denying his pro se motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87402 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The charges against Schoch arose from allegations that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
State v. Anthony M. Reynolds
), 943.32(1)(a), 941.30(1), 940.30 and 949.23(1), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
), 943.32(1)(a), 941.30(1), 940.30 and 949.23(1), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Christopher B. v. Timothy L. Schoeneck
undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran seminary in 1988, he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15148 - 2017-09-21
undisputed. Schoeneck testified that after he graduated from a Lutheran seminary in 1988, he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15148 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel C. Tuescher
, but that conviction was vacated and he was later convicted of and sentenced for first-degree reckless injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14459 - 2017-09-21
, but that conviction was vacated and he was later convicted of and sentenced for first-degree reckless injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14459 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven D. Cathey
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven D. Cathey
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in imposing the jail sentences because he did not refuse probation, and no probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-03-31