Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5621 - 5630 of 63721 for records/1000.
Search results 5621 - 5630 of 63721 for records/1000.
State v. David T.O.
to the charges, but denied the State's petition for waiving David into adult court because he had no prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
to the charges, but denied the State's petition for waiving David into adult court because he had no prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99852 - 2017-09-21
report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99852 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92070 - 2013-01-29
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92070 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
explained that, for the reasons stated on the record at trial, it found that Hoague had failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138824 - 2015-04-01
explained that, for the reasons stated on the record at trial, it found that Hoague had failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138824 - 2015-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103043 - 2017-09-21
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103043 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we No. 2018AP2071-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259364 - 2020-05-05
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we No. 2018AP2071-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259364 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140855 - 2017-09-21
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166971 - 2017-09-21
2 record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166971 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103043 - 2013-10-14
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103043 - 2013-10-14