Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5621 - 5630 of 20932 for word.

COURT OF APPEALS
is that an exact replication of what was said when the person called 911. Q It may not be a word-for-word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108360 - 2014-02-24

COURT OF APPEALS
common in an investigation to want to get the next person up. In other words, Ms. Baumgarten wasn’t his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29

Kathy Hoffman v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
both collective bargaining agreements or reject them in one vote; in other words, the membership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2621 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
of sentencing after determining that it had mistakenly used the word “concurrent” instead of “consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15489 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Otmar Rabas v. Claim Management Services, Inc.
as mandating the magic words “direct and indirect;” to do so would place form over substance. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8940 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and the cases following it have also made clear that “magic words” are neither required nor sufficient. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713540 - 2023-10-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is evidenced by the words they chose, if those words are unambiguous.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638203 - 2023-03-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
practice to read the Informing the Accused word-for-word or verbatim …. [T]here was to my understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138491 - 2017-09-21

Sylvester Rakowski v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company
that all claims would be paid, so that filing would not be necessary. This slight difference in wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14189 - 2005-03-31

WI App 116 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2592-CR Complete Titl...
. DISCUSSION ¶5 We decide this case on narrow grounds from the words of the statute itself. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122875 - 2014-11-17