Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56241 - 56250 of 61946 for judgment.
Search results 56241 - 56250 of 61946 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
a “Motion on Clarification of Judgment of Motion to Dismiss for a Lack of Subject-matter Jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30270 - 2007-09-17
a “Motion on Clarification of Judgment of Motion to Dismiss for a Lack of Subject-matter Jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30270 - 2007-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
community board, through its treatment facilities and personnel, to make these medical judgments.” Id.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27399 - 2006-12-12
community board, through its treatment facilities and personnel, to make these medical judgments.” Id.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27399 - 2006-12-12
[PDF]
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
to portray his failure to remove the toy from his pocket as an “error of judgment” or a “mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13357 - 2017-09-21
to portray his failure to remove the toy from his pocket as an “error of judgment” or a “mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13357 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241926 - 2019-06-07
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241926 - 2019-06-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed the judgment of conviction. In 2001, Richardson moved to modify his sentence, arguing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117659 - 2017-09-21
affirmed the judgment of conviction. In 2001, Richardson moved to modify his sentence, arguing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117659 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
are conclusive. Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1)(a). This court may not substitute its judgment for LIRC’s as it relates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
are conclusive. Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1)(a). This court may not substitute its judgment for LIRC’s as it relates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support the conviction. We rejected Moffett’s argument and summarily affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
was insufficient to support the conviction. We rejected Moffett’s argument and summarily affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment, the trial court held a two-day bench trial. The parties stipulated to the value of the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
judgment, the trial court held a two-day bench trial. The parties stipulated to the value of the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
affirmed the judgment and order on direct appeal. See State v. Harris, No. 2002AP85-CR, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28386 - 2014-09-15
affirmed the judgment and order on direct appeal. See State v. Harris, No. 2002AP85-CR, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28386 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence of twenty-two years in prison. On appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction. In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117659 - 2014-07-21
sentence of twenty-two years in prison. On appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction. In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117659 - 2014-07-21