Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56251 - 56260 of 61946 for judgment.
Search results 56251 - 56260 of 61946 for judgment.
CA Blank Order
are conclusive. Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1)(a). This court may not substitute its judgment for LIRC’s as it relates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
are conclusive. Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1)(a). This court may not substitute its judgment for LIRC’s as it relates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support the conviction. We rejected Moffett’s argument and summarily affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
was insufficient to support the conviction. We rejected Moffett’s argument and summarily affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment, the trial court held a two-day bench trial. The parties stipulated to the value of the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
judgment, the trial court held a two-day bench trial. The parties stipulated to the value of the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
affirmed the judgment and order on direct appeal. See State v. Harris, No. 2002AP85-CR, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28386 - 2014-09-15
affirmed the judgment and order on direct appeal. See State v. Harris, No. 2002AP85-CR, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28386 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence of twenty-two years in prison. On appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction. In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117659 - 2014-07-21
sentence of twenty-two years in prison. On appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction. In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117659 - 2014-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
any arguably meritorious issues, and we summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
any arguably meritorious issues, and we summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
Sandra L. Pauloski v. Stephen J. Pauloski
After a hearing, the circuit court made the following findings. The original judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5874 - 2005-03-31
After a hearing, the circuit court made the following findings. The original judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184976 - 2017-09-21
the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184976 - 2017-09-21
Kerry D. Severson v. Donald Gudmanson
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13039 - 2005-03-31
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13039 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to judgment because he “engaged in due diligence and filed a written admission with the court admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02
to judgment because he “engaged in due diligence and filed a written admission with the court admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02