Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5631 - 5640 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 5631 - 5640 of 6391 for dr.
Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
that this was a significant discrepancy, but addressed the issue, stating: Dr. Brown’s budget, her income is substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11100 - 2005-03-31
that this was a significant discrepancy, but addressed the issue, stating: Dr. Brown’s budget, her income is substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As for the failure to call an expert witness on Famous’s behalf, while Famous referred to a “Dr. Stonefield” in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153068 - 2017-09-21
. As for the failure to call an expert witness on Famous’s behalf, while Famous referred to a “Dr. Stonefield” in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153068 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in not communicating those factors to Dr. Christensen or at least in so egregiously understating the switchover time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34866 - 2008-12-10
in not communicating those factors to Dr. Christensen or at least in so egregiously understating the switchover time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34866 - 2008-12-10
Ann Renee Culligan v. Nicolas Cindric
and, in this case, by Dr. Andrew Paulson, of the children’s best interests. As we said, custody and placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5595 - 2005-03-31
and, in this case, by Dr. Andrew Paulson, of the children’s best interests. As we said, custody and placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5595 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin J. Pierce
motion for a remand to determine competency. On remand, based upon a report of Dr. Kenneth Smail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10056 - 2005-03-31
motion for a remand to determine competency. On remand, based upon a report of Dr. Kenneth Smail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10056 - 2005-03-31
State v. George Taylor
at trial, Dr. Ronald Sindberg and Mr. Christ Yiannackkopolous, opined that Taylor had been suffering from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
at trial, Dr. Ronald Sindberg and Mr. Christ Yiannackkopolous, opined that Taylor had been suffering from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth C. Applegate v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
to prohibit impeachment cross-examination of Dr. Stiehl … by refusing to allow reference to his contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15830 - 2005-03-31
to prohibit impeachment cross-examination of Dr. Stiehl … by refusing to allow reference to his contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 4
also relies heavily upon the testimony and opinion of Cree witness Dr. Darald Hanusa. Cree uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311702 - 2021-02-08
also relies heavily upon the testimony and opinion of Cree witness Dr. Darald Hanusa. Cree uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311702 - 2021-02-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
ILLNESS: The patient is a 79-year-old Caucasian female admitted by Dr. Cleary for further evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30343 - 2014-09-15
ILLNESS: The patient is a 79-year-old Caucasian female admitted by Dr. Cleary for further evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Door County Department of Health & Family Services v. Scott S.
further argues that the circuit court erred by allowing a psychologist, Dr. Michael Sayers, to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15269 - 2017-09-21
further argues that the circuit court erred by allowing a psychologist, Dr. Michael Sayers, to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15269 - 2017-09-21