Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5631 - 5640 of 65039 for timed.

State v. David L. Fries
that there was no probable cause for an arrest at the time of the de facto arrest by frisking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth J. Hoefer
, and then returned to the centerline, and this occurred approximately five times. Sherven said Hoefer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13535 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
The first time that the jury told the judge of their inability to reach a conclusion was a relatively short
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31007 - 2007-11-28

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kate A. Christnot
Attorney Christnot by No. 04-0481-D 3 telephone some 20 times between September 1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16825 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dunn County v. Kelly D.
that at no time before or after this 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3128 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
child during the marriage who was emancipated at the time of the divorce. Richard, a CPA with an MBA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82398 - 2012-05-15

[PDF] State v. Willard E. Lott
argues that his attorney did not ask Lott what he had to drink or the amount of time he was drinking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14386 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Polewcynzski’s messages did not exist at the time of the trial. M.T.W argues that newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=408212 - 2021-08-11

[PDF] WI APP 137
to submit to the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test outside the presence of the jury but at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89308 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
$10,559.50 in damages. They instead argue for the first time on appeal, that the court erred by piercing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424507 - 2021-09-14