Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56341 - 56350 of 63389 for records.
Search results 56341 - 56350 of 63389 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it will charge a public fire protection service fee on a per parcel basis. The Record reflects that Dunst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067533 - 2026-01-28
that it will charge a public fire protection service fee on a per parcel basis. The Record reflects that Dunst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067533 - 2026-01-28
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139882 - 2015-04-21
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139882 - 2015-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the record establishes that all four prongs are satisfied here. In addition, we note that contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27286 - 2006-12-04
the record establishes that all four prongs are satisfied here. In addition, we note that contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27286 - 2006-12-04
Barbara Melone v. State
in the record and yields a conclusion based on logic and founded on a proper legal standard. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2479 - 2005-03-31
in the record and yields a conclusion based on logic and founded on a proper legal standard. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2479 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Kluck
of sixteen months aggregate jail time. The sentencing hearing transcript is not part of the appeal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9519 - 2005-03-31
of sixteen months aggregate jail time. The sentencing hearing transcript is not part of the appeal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Adversary Counsel for Jane ¶16 The record does not show that Jane, her paid guardian, or her GAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27
. Adversary Counsel for Jane ¶16 The record does not show that Jane, her paid guardian, or her GAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the appellate record that was transmitted to this court. Thus, the facts relayed herein are derived from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
in the appellate record that was transmitted to this court. Thus, the facts relayed herein are derived from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
Fred Wessel v. Brian Schmidlin
made?” and Wessel responded in the affirmative. Further, the record demonstrates that both Wessel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6914 - 2017-09-20
made?” and Wessel responded in the affirmative. Further, the record demonstrates that both Wessel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6914 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and that his motion for resentencing was procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
, and that his motion for resentencing was procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18