Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56371 - 56380 of 68202 for law.
Search results 56371 - 56380 of 68202 for law.
[PDF]
State v. Bernard L. Beyer
court correctly applied the statutory penalty enhancer is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11889 - 2017-09-21
court correctly applied the statutory penalty enhancer is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11889 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick L. McCree
on the relevant law. We conclude that no misuse of discretion occurred at McCree’s sentencing hearing. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21118 - 2006-01-30
on the relevant law. We conclude that no misuse of discretion occurred at McCree’s sentencing hearing. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21118 - 2006-01-30
Kathy Davis v. Jodine Deppisch
stayed within its jurisdiction, whether it acted according to law, whether the action was arbitrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21463 - 2006-02-21
stayed within its jurisdiction, whether it acted according to law, whether the action was arbitrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21463 - 2006-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
person” in the first instance is a question of law. Therefore, the circuit court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33267 - 2008-06-30
person” in the first instance is a question of law. Therefore, the circuit court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33267 - 2008-06-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
a claim for relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Cook v. Public Storage, Inc
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
October Table of unpublished opinions
of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39 - 2004-11-08
of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39 - 2004-11-08
State v. Crissy Marie Monchamp
in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18170 - 2010-01-13
in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18170 - 2010-01-13
July Table of unpublished opinions
estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42 - 2004-09-06
estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42 - 2004-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that this court considers de novo, while determining whether a new factor warrants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
is a question of law that this court considers de novo, while determining whether a new factor warrants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
State v. Steven Curtes
to suppress evidence raises a constitutional question, which presents a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11784 - 2011-09-01
to suppress evidence raises a constitutional question, which presents a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11784 - 2011-09-01